Foreword
I
often ask my beginning astronomy students to list the characteristics
of remote objects that can be measured by going outside and looking
at the nighttime sky (either with or without a telescope). Their responses
are almost limitless -- distances, sizes, colors, temperatures, etc.
Certainly, these are examples of the ultimate goals of a scientific
investigation, but they don't really answer the question that was
posed. I then try to convince these students that there are only two
basic quantities that one can define about the radiation coming from
distant "points of light" -- the objects we call planets, stars, and
galaxies -- namely, "I see an object of a certain brightness in a
particular direction." From these two very rudimentary pieces of information,
all of the other characteristics must be derived. The roots of this
generality extend back to the ancient star catalogs of Hipparchus
and Ptolemy. Without doubt, our modern catalogs contain much more
information. We collect and analyze light at slightly different frequencies
(i.e., forming a spectrum) or from slightly different directions in
space (i.e., forming an image), but the underlying information is
the same: how bright is the object seen in some carefully specified
direction.
The
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory Astronomical Photoelectric Photometry
Manual is the latest of Jeff Hopkins' contributions to this
quest. For 25 years, he has built his own equipment, collected/reduced
data, and contributed to the study of variable stars. It is said that
to teach is to learn twice. This is certainly true of Jeff's endeavors.
In these pages he describes some of the techniques that work. Readers
should take heart that this is not necessarily a cookbook. The process
is as much a form of art as it is science. In fact, the title of one
of Jeff's earlier texts was Zen and the Art of Photoelectric
Photometry. There is no simple way to throw together some
equipment, point a telescope at a star, and miraculously have the
answer come out. Thus, I encourage readers to look at this manual
as a starting point. What are some of problems that might or probably
will be encountered?
In
an era of relatively inexpensive CCD detectors, it is reasonable to
question the value of single-channel photoelectric photometry (PEP).
The manual addresses some of the justifications. One reason is that
PEP is better suited to observing bright stars -- and there certainly
are many entries in the Bright Star Catalog that would
benefit from extensive observing! A second reason is that major photometry
systems were developed using the PEP approach. Hence, the best way
of matching new observations to those in a well established data base
is to use equipment and techniques as similar as possible to the original.
This idea is often forgotten in today's sea of panoramic detectors.
Even the faint (12th-14th magnitude) secondary standard stars of the
UBV system often used to calibrate CCD images were defined using the
photoelectric methods described here. Finally, I find the most compelling
reason to use modern PEP techniques is that one becomes much more
intimate with the data. Careless image processing can easily produce
pretty, but otherwise worthless, pictures. Push a few buttons and
see a result pop up on the screen. However, if one critically examines
the PEP process and questions the validity of each individual step,
then one produces not only an excellent product but also pride of
ownership. Nature will reveal her secrets to those who look carefully
and ask the right questions. So, I encourage readers to use this new
manual as a fresh resource. Then, adopt a star or two as your favorites
and try to determine the stories they are telling.
Paul
Schmidtke
Arizona State University
May 31, 2004